Bad Reasons To Convert To Catholicism

Evangelicals converting to Catholicism has become something of a trend. Many conservative episcopalians caught between a rock and a hard place have opted for a return to Rome. And there are some big names in evangelical theology who have gone over, including the (until just recently) President of the Evangelical Theological Society. Scot MacKnight has just written a piece in the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (JETS) trying to figure out why the Roman road has grown more and more popular these days.

The Pontificator has written a series of posts on “Bad Reasons Not To Convert To Catholicism”. (The assumption is that you want to convert, but you have wrongheaded protestant baggage holding you back.) But of course that there are bad reasons-not-to-convert does not imply there are no good reasons-not-to-convert. However I am not going to be offering good reasons not to convert to Roman Catholicism: first, because I’m not positive there are any, though I have my suspicions; second, because I am not in the business of trying to dissuade people of their religious commitments for the sake of winning an argument on the internet. What I am going to do is to critique one very bad reason for turning Roman Catholic which is often used as a sort of bludgeon by triumphal converts against their former protestant co-religionists.

Here is a quote from someone I will not name, discussing the ‘greater joy’ he found upon his conversion to Roman Catholicism:

“Why this greater joy? Because I do not have to be the judge in judgment of the Catholic Church, of the Scriptures, or even of myself. It’s not my job. Millions of people over a period of two thousand years have reflected on our holy faith, and struggled with it, some cases even given up their life for it. Shall I improve on their combined insight, as it is shared with us through the Magisterium? Shall I pit my few decades against millions and millon [sic] of man years? No!”

I have nothing against conversion to Roman Catholicism, and nothing against people being happy about a renewal of their spiritual life that attends upon conversion. But the implication of this quote is that the protestant is a theological solipsist who has arrogated to himself a right to judgment he cannot possibly use well.

I won’t debate whether this is an accurate representation of Protestant theology. (It isn’t, but I’ll leave that to my theologian friends to demonstrate.) At any rate historical ignorance is not an essential part of protestantism, but it certainly is true that Protestantism emphasizes the importance of individual judgment and individual faith and so on.

Which brings me to the problem with the quote above. In making his statement, the author absolves himself of all responsibility and judgment. I don’t have to think anymore about what is true, good and so forth, the Magisterium will tell me. It is hard work to be thoughtful and responsible and to learn judgment. But everything fine is difficult. Thoughtfulness, responsibility and judgment are virtues the cultivation of which the church ought to be in the business of teaching. Indeed these virtues are not lacking from the more mature, reflective expressions of Roman Catholicism I’ve encountered in my life either.

Protestant or Roman Catholic, there is something basically deficient in a person who just goes along with whatever is said at church on the basis of blind authority. Being Roman Catholic does not obviate the necessity of using one’s own judgment just because the Magisterium isn’t always there beside you to tell you what you ought to do in daily life.

And converting to Roman Catholicism doesn’t solve your worry about individualism because it is still you, the individual, who converts. By your act of conversion you make your own private judgment upon the entire 500 year tradition of protestantism. And we have a couple of smart people over in our camp too. So it simply ridiculous to say that you want to be Roman Catholic so you don’t have to act as a judge over history . . . you are always already judging history.

None of this says that one cannot have an appreciation for the past. Just as I have avoided implying that Roman Catholicism as such requires the denial of responsibility, so too should any Roman Catholics avoid implying that Protestantism as such requires the denial of history. To be a Christian well requires both, not a decision between them.



4 Responses to Bad Reasons To Convert To Catholicism

  1. goobynelly says:

    Thanks Shane. This was excellent. It’s well-thought out people who draw me to Catholicism in the first place, and nothing would be worse than giving up the theological task to them. I would rather carry it out with them at the Altar-Table, which I hope happens soon. In the meantime, I would like to hear what Catholics think about those who convert to Protestantism and why it happens. There is a road from Rome to Wittenburg as well, although the fact that I had to look that up on wikipedia shows that Protestants have no city to call their own these days. At least Evangelicals still have Colorado Springs. 🙂

  2. Pontificator says:

    I can think of plenty of good reasons why someone might convert from Catholicism to Protestantism: experience of community, experience of a personal relationship with Christ, biblical preaching, strong emphasis on the unmerited grace of God. All may and should be found in Catholic congregations but too often are not.

  3. geomac says:

    Very good observation scholasticus. I have heard this argument made many times in many ways by RC apologists. It is one that has always left me baffled. Usually it takes the form of some kind of denunciation of “private judgement”, as if the decision to accept the infallible truth of RC teaching by an individual is somehow not a “private judgement”. The very fact of accepting RC teaching has somehow transformed the decision making process, after the fact I guess, into a process different from that of a person deciding to reject RC teaching. It appears the person you quote above has bought into that idea, strongly endorsed by the Keating/Hahn types.

    I do not have to be the judge

    There, that is what baffles me.

  4. […] of anything. I’ve also written before that a desire not to have to think for oneself is a bad reason to convert to catholicism. In other words, many catholic apologists (I deliberately avoid saying ‘the Catholic […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: